Betting Systems & Strategies Forum
In this section of Online Betting Exposed you can ask questions about the betting systems and services we review, discuss how they work and even post your own ideas and suggestions for maximizing your profits from them.
Here are a few simple guidelines to follow:
1. When discussing betting systems please try your best not to give too many of the system rules away as this is obviously a public forum. It’s absolutely fine to discuss different aspects of the systems, but if you go into too much detail we may have to edit your comments.
2. Please refrain from posting negative comments about any system or service that may be deemed slanderous by the vendor, unless you have good reason to do so. If you wish to report a vendor for operating illegally or unethically please contact us and we’ll look into it for you.
3. As always, we encourage you to participate on every area of our website, but you should note that all comments are moderated and for the good of everyone who visits we simply can’t tolerate bad language, or any other kind of abusive behaviour, so please act responsibly.
And finally, we’ve set up this section so that you’ve got a handy place to come to for chatting about anything betting related that doesn’t quite slot into any other category, so please don’t let this stop you from commenting on the individual reviews we’ve posted in other sections as that’s what they’re there for and your feedback is always more than welcome.
Until next time,
Online Betting Exposed
@Stewboss
Look forward to that, always better when the form settles down
Lee
@nightshiftman
You can follow mine from late Sept / early Oct onwards.
I call it ‘The Shot Supremacy System’ and it’s rather good (if I say so myself).
@ Paul / Craig - Is there anywhere on here where I can proof my selections?
I was also thinking of the Punter’s Lounge forum.
Jeff,
Can’t say I’ve ever had that problem with GHB before and I’ve never used the widen the odds option. Mind you, I’ve never used it for LTP either, so perhaps it is something to do with the place market??
All e-mailers. Just got in from work so will reply to your e-mails tomorrow ref LTP+FF filter.
@ghanimah, Paul,
I left GHB to run live unatteneded today and it only bet 1 double loser (7.10) from 7 possibles which seems less than everyone else. I have Widen Odds set to 5 ticks.
Any suggestions?
We’re planning to test a few in the next couple of months starting with the next set of tests in September.
If anyone’s found any that they’re interested in, drop us a line and we’ll try to get a hold of it to test.
Evening all,
Anyone got any nice footy systems to follow ????
In my experience GHB always submits the bets and exactly when you tell it to do it too. Whether the money is there to match them is another matter.
If in doubt use the feature that lets you choose to take a couple of points higher or lower than the odds requested. Then you’re guaranteed to be matched.
I agree NG, despite email’s from a number of helpful people on this board regarding settings with GHB and LTP, GHB has missed 2 bets today and only half layed another, via paper trading. I still can’t trust it to do the job when I’m not there.
Having said that, manually today LTP has been poor 3 double losers and 1 half winner so far :-(.
Compared to laybot pro (betbot pro), GHB is very slow to execute bets. Even when choosing only from available odds there is a delay when GHB executes the bet and if the market is moving quickly in the wrong direction it can miss the bet altogether.
hi
can anyone tell me if the GHB can be configured for the favorites phenomenon system?
thanks in advance
paul
@ Jeff re page 150 on FF
You read my mind on that one.
I ran the criteria through the Massey site (don’t know how accurate that is) and it looked very profitable indeed going back several years.
I’m going to look at this a little closer when I get the time.
Well done Jeff !!!
@Craig,
Thanks for that. Just an example of how we can use our combined brain power & experience to improve on winning systems for our mutual benefit. That’s what makes this site different from the rest. I’ll slightly misquote Oscar Wilde, replacing I for we, who when stopped at customs said, “We have nothing to declare but our Genius”.
Jeff I have to echo Andy’s comments - excellent work mate, much appreciated
Anyone wanting the exact criteria for the LTP + FF filter send me your e-mail adress to jdyer@mmm.com. I’m not around tomorrow (I hope my bots work!!!) so won’t get back to you until wednesday.
For authentication please include the following.
From LTP manual.
Page 1. Section 4. Line 1. Word 7.
From False Favorites manual.
Page 116. Para 1. Line 3. 1st word.
cheers.
Jeff.
jeff, excellent work you are doing regarding ltp and ff. cheers pal !
@Stewboss.
ref your page 150 ref. You could probably run a system in it’s own right on that criteria alone. 70% strike rate is not bad. I wonder how the odds work out. Collating the data might be a chore though, I’m not sure how it could be done from conventional records without having to analise every runner. I might have a look at that one day. Too many plates spinning at the moment.
@NG.
Correct.
I think there’s room to expand into other parts of FF as well but for the time being it’s quite interesting to see what happens with this basic one. I’m sure that many will see the reduced profits as a turnoff, don’t shoot the messenger, but I quite like the fact that this is offset by double the ROI. This could mean bigger stakes for less risk. To be fair we need a bigger sample which is our usual complaint of other systems on here from pro system providers.
If you want the exact criteria but don’t want your e-mail address on here, send your e-mail address to jdyer@mmm.com and I’ll reply.
cheers.
@ Jeff
Please can you send me details of the FF filter you have applied - stewboss@fastmail.fm
The first word on page 150 is Gender.
Incidentally, page 150 is VERY interesting in it’s own right.
Without giving too much away, it casts doubt a fundamental selection criterion in these systems:-
Four The Win 1
Trainer Flat Stats