Online Betting Exposed
Betting System / Service Testing

Refuse To Lose

Refuse To LoseRefuse To Lose is a new backing/dutching system that’s written by Bernard Hibbert of Chester Racing Club and supplied through Sportsworld Publishing that comes with a claimed 80% strike rate, which is quite some claim!

In order to achieve this strike rate, the method focuses on very specific racing trends and, as such, there will be a few ‘no bet’ days but occasionally, I’m told, there may be two or three bets in a day. Since the system came into being in Dec 2007, it has achieved a claimed 1030 points profit up to the end of February - another big claim!

Refuse To Lose, comes in the form of a 10 page Word document, with the last two pages dedicated to previous results. It is a fairly easy read, although there is a lot of information to absorb, and the method itself will take a little getting used to. However, for the next three months there is a tipping line updated daily so it is possible to check your selections against those of the author, which will certainly prove helpful in the early days.

My initial impressions are really quite good. It’s not a new idea, but is something I’d never thought of before and certainly makes a lot of sense. I do have some initial reservations, those being that the dutching is done with two horses at the sharp end of the market and therefore can effectively be like backing at heavy odds on which means the strike rate really will need to be 80% or there about.

The guide comes with its own staking plan dependant on the odds of our selections and keeps it nice and simple, just a case of checking the prices of the selections against the points value allocated to those particular odds in the table within the guide - simple really!  Also, it uses a loss recovery plan but it’s not overly agressive and as long as the strike rate is in the claimed region then shouldn’t pose any problems.

Now, for the bank…the Refuse To Lose system recommends a 1000 point bank and so for this test we’ll start with a £2000 bank and a stake of £2 per point.  And, as always, we’ll keep you up to date on our day to day progress in the systems testing area of the site.

Until next time,
Craig
Online Betting Exposed

Published on April 10, 2008

PS -- Ask a question or leave your comments about this article below...

See What Others Say
  1. Jono on April 15th, 2008 8:20 pm

    I have look at their website but I am not sure what they offer you….Email or telephone service? Do you have to call them to find out the tips for horse race or receive the email from them?

    Many thanks,

    Jono

  2. Craig on April 15th, 2008 8:27 pm

    You get an ebook with the system detailed step by step - all four of them :)

  3. Jono on April 15th, 2008 8:50 pm

    Ok..If you say all four of them but I dont want to call them. Will email is ok for me? :)

    Cheers Craig

  4. Paul on April 16th, 2008 2:11 am

    Jono, the complete system is included in the ebook, so that’s all you need. They’ve set up a telephone line that you can phone to check the selections, but it isn’t necessary to do that.

  5. Jeremy on April 18th, 2008 4:14 am

    This is looking really promising Craig. Early days obviously, but 10% profit on the bank after three betting days isn’t to be sniffed at!

  6. Craig on April 18th, 2008 10:14 am

    Like you say Jeremy, it is early days, but the profit it has generated has taken me by surprise. I had a feeling it would be a good little system, but not this good :)

  7. Paul on April 18th, 2008 10:57 am

    Chas, you can use the online version of the Racing Post. We’ve been checking the selections on their phone line against the online RP and you definitely can get the info you need from there.

  8. Paul on April 19th, 2008 1:11 pm

    Chas, I think the only difference is that you need to click through to the individual race info to see if a second favourite has won. It’s easy enough though, plus it saves £50 a month or whatever the RP costs these days too :-)

  9. James on April 22nd, 2008 2:57 pm

    Hi Guys

    Its nice to see that it recovered fully yesterday .

    Can you please enlighten us on how many pts you had to risk yesterday to get it to recover fully and in the worst case senario, would it mean a very large stake if you had lost yesterday

    Best wishes

    James

  10. Craig on April 22nd, 2008 3:18 pm

    Hi James,

    It was 93 points required to win back the previous losses, which isn’t bad when you’re working off a 1000 point bank ;)

  11. James on April 28th, 2008 11:34 am

    Been away for a few days . Thanks for the response Craig but lets break it down a bit

    On Day 6 you lost 204 , then the next day you had to risk another 93 pts , so in fact you were working off a 806 pt bank and not a 1000 pt bank. Now if you had lost on day 7, ( which could have happened, anything can happen in horse racing ) , you would be down almost 300 pts. My question is , if this was the case , would you have to risk 300 pts in the next race to claim back the loses .

  12. Craig on April 28th, 2008 12:15 pm

    It’s impossible to say how much you’d have to risk James as the amount of points you risk is entirely dependant on the odds available. Some of the winners we’ve had have been at surprisingly good prices.

    I’m not saying this is fool proof, but I do think that if the strike rate is confirmed at 80% then your bank will be safe. Yes, it will take a dip, and sometimes that will be a big dip, but that’s why the author has set a sensible 1000 point bank.

  13. James on May 4th, 2008 1:40 pm

    Hi Craig, Just wondering if the phone line does be updated on a Sunday ? . It is usually updated between 12 - 1 pm. Its 1.40 pm and no update for today

  14. Craig on May 4th, 2008 2:11 pm

    Hi James,

    I called it around 11:45 this morning and it had been updated then….they said something about having a problem yesterday.

    There’s no selection today though.

  15. James on May 4th, 2008 2:16 pm

    This is extremely strange . I have been calling in the last 2 hrs and it keeps giving me yesterday’s info . Weird ! . As always , thanks for you speedy reply Craig

  16. Craig on May 4th, 2008 2:22 pm

    Totally baffling me, I’ve just tried it again just now and got today’s message so that’s really strange!

    If you have problems tomorrow drop me a line and I’ll let you know the score.

  17. James on May 11th, 2008 1:54 am

    Hi Craig . We had a loss on Thurs . Total staked was 69 pts . hope this helps . It does not matter anyways, as today’s ( sat ) win would have recovered the loss .

  18. Craig on May 11th, 2008 9:04 am

    James, you’re a true gent :)

    Thanks very much, I’ll not bother updating the P/L then as it will be identical.

Have Your Say:






Online Betting Exposed