Online Betting Exposed
Betting System / Service Testing

Stat Attack - Final Review

So, we’ve come to the end of our test of Stat Attack and we’ve had 30 betting days from 30 so right off the bat it’s safe to say it’s an ideal system for those that like regular action.

Before we get into how the trial went, I’ll give you a quick recap of what Stat Attack is. Stat Attack is a three in one laying system. The author has devised three distinct strategies aimed at achieving significant long term profit. The three systems take all of two minutes to read, digest and understand and really are very, very simple to operate. Each system is completely independent of the other, and you can choose to run any individual system or all three. For the trial, I used all three and placed my bets automatically via Grey Horse Bot. This meant spending 15 minutes in the morning getting my selections, followed by five minutes entering them into GHB and hey presto, my job was done and I was free to get on with other things. The test started with a £2000 bank and £20 stakes.

In the 30 days of action, we generated a smidge over 32 points profit (with Betfair commission inc.) and just over 30 points taking off 5% commission which is really quite impressive and meant £643 profit to £20 stakes - but that doesn’t tell the whole story. As I said earlier Stat Attack is actually three systems and each day I’ve given a P&L update on each. Below I’ve listed how each individual system performed:

System ‘A’ = £371.70 (30 day’s betting)
System ‘B’ = £249.66 (23 day’s betting)
System ‘C’ = £21.80 (10 day’s betting)

As you can see, System ‘A’ was the most profitable, but also the busiest by some considerable way (in fact, although I don’t have exact figures, I’d estimate that 85% of the selections were for System ‘A’), followed by System ‘B’ and then ‘C’. Whereas System’s ‘A’ and ‘B’ are for use on both flat and jumps racing, System ‘C’ only has selections over the jumps and this will, in part, explain it’s lack of betting days. From the results, it’s pretty clear System ‘B’ is most profitable, not only did it have less betting days, but also the odds are much shorter than System ‘A’, max odds of 9/2 compared to 7/1 - and it’s probably the system that makes most sense to me too. I’m disappointed we couldn’t have played in more System ‘C’ selections, but with the time of year there wasn’t going to be many, but I do think that would be a pretty solid system too.

There’s little doubt Stat Attack is profitable, and will continue to be in the future. I have seen Paul Fowlie’s (the system author) results from the turn of the year and they make for pretty interesting reading - £20,000 profit to £100 stakes split £9,000, £4,000 and £7000 for each system respectively. Had we been betting to £100 stakes this month we’d have made £3215 which fairly closely mirrors the results we would have expected. Now that’s a damn fine monthly income :)

All that and on auto-pilot too?? Hmm, yes please!

Until next time,
Craig
Online Betting Exposed

Published on June 25, 2008

PS -- Ask a question or leave your comments about this article below...

See What Others Say
  1. Steve on September 25th, 2008 3:22 pm

    On Stat Attack did you just use the SP’s quoted when you entered in the GHB or did you add 10% to give you a Betfair prices to bet at

Have Your Say:






Online Betting Exposed