The Cambridge Target System 04/06/08
If you followed the newspaper today you’ve probably had the worst day ever since I started this trial, but if you followed the Sporting Life you would have picked up on the 10/1 winner in the 7.40pm at Kempton. That was the only one that made the difference between a no-lose day and a bloody well drastic day, so I hope you followed me in on this.
When I finish this trial on Friday I’m going to give you a few tips that I feel could improve your profits considerably from this system. There are a few things (not least of all the published results) that I’m not exactly comfortable with, but on the whole I do like the general idea.
I’ve taken a clean approach to this whole test, not getting involved in yo-yo prices at all, and basing everything on the very last show that’s available for you to bet at, so I feel - without any doubt at all - that the results you see here are as close as you’ll get to perfect. On the whole it’s been a very profitable period, but stay tuned because I’ve got more to say on the matter.
04-Jun Lin 1.50 -£25.00
04-Jun Lin 2.20 -£25.00
04-Jun Fon 2.30 -£25.00
04-Jun Lin 2.50 -£25.00
04-Jun Fon 3.00 -£25.00
04-Jun Lin 3.20 £75.00
04-Jun Fon 3.30 -£25.00
04-Jun Lin 4.20 £56.25
04-Jun Fon 4.30 -£25.00
04-Jun Lin 4.50 -£25.00
04-Jun Kem 6.40 -£25.00
04-Jun Kem 7.10 -£25.00
04-Jun Rip 7.20 -£25.00
04-Jun Kem 7.40 £250.00
04-Jun Kem 8.10 -£25.00
04-Jun Rip 8.40 -£25.00
04-Jun Kem 9.10 -£25.00
Day 12 P/L = £31.25
Total Profit = £689.01
Bank = £1689.01
All results are taken at SP and the bets are placed with a bookie, so no commission is applied.
Until next time,
Online Betting Exposed
Nice!
Any reason no to pick Klynch at Kempton 6.10? Grade 1 from 9/4 to Evens. it went to win. Unfortunately i missed the evening races.
Also what do you mean with “not getting involved in yo-yo prices at all”? Do you ignore those bets? Or you just get the last price not matter if it’s higher? Please clarify. Thanks
There was two grade 1 qualifiers in that race Lynn and the odds weren’t high enough to warrant backing both.
I’m talking about the way I’ve reported the results, so if a runner has drifted before the off I haven’t included it in the results. I’ve reported everything based on the post-race liveshow information, so that the results are all accurate and correct.
I see. You’re probably speaking about Scrapper Smith 33/1>10/1. My mistake, since I didn’t mention I don’t consider prices above 25/1 because they would be too far from the highest odds displayed in the system table. Personal choice, but I should have mentioned it, sorry.
About the results, it’s still not clear to me if you would include a horse that goes like this: 6/1>10/3>3/1>10/3>3/1. Thanks
It was actually Kingsgate Storm that was the other qualifier.
Yes I would include that one Lynn….
I had Kingsgate Storm quoted at 5/1 by SL and then the SP was 6, so no qualifier for me. This seems to be a case of odds adjusted by SL. Can I ask you what time roughly you checked their quotes? I did it maybe around 11 am
I just run through the races one by one as they’re happening Lynn and it was 12/1 in the paper and also on the SL website.
How do you note the forecasts if you check it at 11am? Do you take screenshots or something and refer to those? I think it would be easier just to check them when you’re actually betting.
Well, my principle is if you take them as close to the off as possible, that’s not a forecast anymore. I mean there could be some insider or whatever info that people ‘in the know’ would become aware of and they could change the odds on the site accordingly. Yesterday it looks like the opposite happened. Anyway what about the paper? They even print their forecast the night before to be delivered early in the morning. I usually save the SL pages the night before. Yesterday it was an exception. My opinion is also supported by the people at SWPublishing.
It’s a forecast in exactly the same way as the Racing Post is a forecast Lynn. I’ve compared the SL with the paper version every single day for a fortnight and probably 98% of the time the forecasts are exactly the same.
How do you mean that what you’re saying is supported by Sportsworld? They use the paper and the paper had it at 12/1, therefore it was a no-bet race.
Look on the bright side - you bet a winner that wasn’t a qualifier and made some money
I was just meaning this was a suggestion I got from their customer service when I told them I would be using the SL forecast instead of The Sun. Anyway you’re right. I do look at the bright side.
I suppose even these small differences would level out in the long run.